It's a secret to everybody.


Harvard Medical School has issued a statement announcing that the New England Primate Research Center will be closing within 24 months.

Harvard’s New England Primate Research Center has been embroiled in an ongoing controversy following the negligent deaths of at least 4 primates.  The facility is currently under investigation by the USDA and faces a potentially major federal fine for multiple violations of the Animal Welfare Act.

“Harvard wants the public to believe that this closure is due to economics,” said Michael A. Budkie, A.H.T., Executive Director, SAEN (Stop Animal Exploitation NOW!).  “That is simply not true.  The only way Harvard could quash this scandal is to close the primate center, because even last year’s resignation of the Center’s Director could not end their ineptitude.  This closure is the direct result of pressure from activists led by SAEN.”

“The closure of Harvard’s Primate Research Center is the best news I have ever heard,” added Budkie.  “The potential exists to bring freedom to many monkeys and to redirect millions of dollars into clinical and epidemiological research which will more directly benefit humans.”

SAEN has announced plans to contact the Harvard Medical School’s administration to explore the possibility of placing at least some of the primates in sanctuaries. 

“These primates have suffered enough,” added Budkie.  “They deserve a chance to have a new life in another environment where their needs will be put first.”

LUSH have campaigned against the REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) legislation since before it became law, because, like many of the animal protection groups, we were very concerned at the huge increase in animal testing that it would cause.

Despite the concerns, it passed into law in 2007 and is currently being rolled out across Europe. In the video we try to explain why we are so worried about REACH animal testing and why consumers should be aware of this largely unknown legislation.

TAKE ACTION! Please sign the petition to the European Commission today and join HSI in calling for immediate action to revise REACH to make full use of animal testing alternatives.

weeptowaterthetrees:
BREAKING: 5 activists in Italy with Contro Green Hill have occupied and barricaded themselves in on the fourth floor of a Pharmacology Dept of a vivisection lab in Milano. This is happening right now - and there is a scheduled march of thousands that will descend on that lab today as well. Stay tuned for updates.This action is for the World Week for Animals in Labs. Folks can also check out their flickr and twitter for photos and updates in Italian. SPEAD THIS!

weeptowaterthetrees:

BREAKING: 5 activists in Italy with Contro Green Hill have occupied and barricaded themselves in on the fourth floor of a Pharmacology Dept of a vivisection lab in Milano. This is happening right now - and there is a scheduled march of thousands that will descend on that lab today as well. Stay tuned for updates.

This action is for the World Week for Animals in Labs.
Folks can also check out their flickr and twitter for photos and updates in Italian.

SPEAD THIS!

MiceA BUAV investigation has uncovered the terrible plight of animals used in research at one of the UK’s leading universities. For more info: licensedtokill.buav.org



Portland Animal Liberation
(PAL) is organizing a week of events in honor of World Week for Animals in Laboratories (WWAIL). Click here for more info.

Don’t live in Portland? Why not plan your own event?


Natural-products giant Nature’s Gate just became the fourth company to pull out of the Chinese market until the country stops requiring tests on animals for cosmetics. After talks with PETA, Nature’s Gate agreed that there is nothing pretty about tormenting animals in laboratories, and the company chose to forgo the large Chinese market, rather than sacrificing its commitment to being cruelty-free.


What do we think when looking at this photo? How beautiful the beagle and rat are? Or, perhaps how incredible it is seeing them together? Surely it’s something positive, optimistic, or uplifting. What we definitely don’t think about is the extreme abuse; intense distress; and severe pain both endured while experimented on in laboratories for days, weeks or months.

When discussing issues pertaining to the abuse, exploitation and torture of non-human animals, individuals are aware of “animal testing” in the common sense – often limited to cosmetics – but few are aware of exactly what goes on and how far-reaching the industry is. The most radical piece of legislation to date, on March 11th (2013) the European Union banned the sale of new animal tested cosmetics. A success worth celebrating; nevertheless the archaic and barbaric practice extends far beyond cosmetics and will continue to take place in the EU, while elsewhere there is even less legislation or regulation.

VIVI- WHAT?

The term “animal testing” describes the experimentation of products and procedures, as well as the investigation of cures or treatments for human diseases and illnesses, on non-human animals. The official term vivisection is a Latin word meaningalive (vivus) and operation (sectio), referring explicitly to experiments conducted on conscious, living beings that have a central nervous system.

WHAT HAPPENS?

Countless experiments are conducted for each product and procedure we can think of, in addition to those we can’t, with the most rigorous ones being used for drugs and food-related items (e.g. engineered ingredients). Other products include cosmetics and skincare; automotive, electronic, and household goods; office supplies (e.g. ink and pens); and even rather peversely “pet” food.

For all of these items each ingredient is tested, as well as the final product. Substances are administered orally; applied to the eyes or skin; inhaled through a mask or in an inhalation chamber; and injected. These procedures are repeated regularly for months or the animal’s entire life in order to test carcinogenicity; damage to organs; eye and skin irritancy; general toxicity; mutagenicity; and reproductive issues.

For a “cure” non-human animals are infected with a disease or have the illness induced, following which the drug or treatment is administered to determine the effects (as listed above); and in testing a medical procedure, animals have both minor and major surgery while conscious, and often without anaesthetic. Experiments even take place on livestock, to find out how animals can produce more offspring or grow fatter faster, as well as to find how (not if) cows can produce more milk or sheep produce more wool.

In some experiments pain and suffering is unavoidable because it is part of the condition or disease, e.g. arthritis or cancer, or because the procedure purposefully causes it, such as electric shocks or full-body restraints; long-term isolation; or withholding sustenance. There are also several procedures where the death of the animal will be the endpoint as part of the experiment design, such as cancer research; infectious disease and toxicity studies; and vaccine trials. Then there are all of the other experiments that take place where distress, pain, and suffering are an unwelcome accompaniment.

A TRICK: COMPANIES MAKE MONEY WHILE WE BECOME SICK

Governments, companies, and even charities want us to believe vivisection is absolutely essential to ensure health and safety, as well as for medical research. The truth is that vivisection is lucrative and for this reason alone it continues. It should come as no surprise that its biggest advocates include those who profit from it, as well as companies that supply laboratories with products and services (cages; food; medical supplies etc.).

The medical and pharmaceutical sectors generate substantial revenue when people become sick, so an unimaginable number of experiments are conducted to make us believe we need their treatments; drugs; and cures in order for us to get better, or even remain well. Moreover, because vivisection is respected within modern medicine, companies; laboratories; and medical centres receive unprecedented amounts of financial support in the form of direct grants (worth millions of dollars) to conduct research.

It is also believed that being able to state something was tested on a non-human animal provides an excuse (i.e. “insurance”) should it prove defective and a consumer wishes to sue. Both genetics and molecular biology show humans and non-human animals differ in profoundly important ways, so no actual assurance can be offered. As a result, there are inherent failings in vivisection, a prime example of which is the drug thalidomide. Tested on non-human animals and believed to be safe for pregnant mothers, it had devastating results for those who used it. Cancer research is another example because, unlike clinical tests, experiments conducted on non-human animals did not link cigarette smoking to lung cancer. This delayed crucial warnings for smoking, while hundreds of thousands of people died.

A LIE: MILLIONS OF ANIMALS DIE

Because the general population cares about animal welfare, we are led to believe non-human animals seldom suffer in experiments. The truth is 100 million animals live in distress, die, or are killed in laboratories each year, none of whom signed a consent form.

We’re told that vivisection is essential, but does NOT mean that the experiments are invaluable, irreplaceable, or even that alternative methods could not have been used. The truth remains that vivisection is unreliable, but even if it wasn’t, it will always be unethical.

DIRECT ACTION

Unfortunately we can’t wipe out the vivisection industry overnight; but we can make changes in our own lives to ensure we aren’t complicit in this abhorrent torture. Most importantly, only buy products from companies that are cruelty-free at all stages of production. The following companies are 100% vegan and a good place to start:

In addition, ensure charitable contributions do not go towards non-human animal experiments (Animal Aid and Humane Seal have information on which charities are cruelty-free).

By Caroline Lennon

Ask Airlines to Stop Shipping Monkeys to Be Tortured


China Airlines
will no longer ship primates to labs, but sadly the cruelty continues. Air France, Philippine Airlines, and Vietnam Airlines are among those who still continue to profit from animals’ misery by transporting monkeys destined for U.S. laboratories.

Take Action!
Please be a voice for the monkeys who are suffering in the primate trade. Take a minute of your time now to urge airlines that still transport monkeys to U.S. laboratories to join their peers and adopt a formal policy against the transportation of nonhuman primates for use in experiments.

Air France

Facebook - Twitter - Google + - Youtube - Instagram - Pinterest

Philippine Airlines

Facebook - Twitter - Youtube - Google + - Pinterest

Vietnam Airlines

Facebook - Twitter - Youtube - Google +

SPREAD THE WORD!

Every year the government wastes over $12 BILLION in tax dollars to pay for cruel, unnecessary, and bizarre animal experiments. Help us expose and eliminate the waste by holding the animal abusers accountable.

The White Coat Waste Project exposes the waste, fraud and abuse in taxpayer-funded animal experimentation. Join us today and help stop this shameful treatment of animals and taxpayers.